The terms you’ll hear at board meetings and on the ballot, in plain language.
Outside organizations across the political spectrum recruit, screen, train, or endorse school board candidates. Knowing who backs a candidate — and what that group asks of them — helps you read a race. Descriptions summarize each organization’s own stated positions.
Looks for candidates who support strong parental authority and transparency in schools and who align with the organization’s positions on curriculum and school policies, including opposition to CRT, gender-identity instruction, sexually explicit materials, and other content it considers inappropriate. Candidates seeking endorsement must agree to the organization’s Parent Pledge and go through its endorsement process.
Supports candidates who want to reduce the influence of the NJEA and teachers’ unions on school boards and increase parental control over education. It favors candidates opposed to what it describes as “woke” policies and curriculum, including CRT, gender and LGBTQ+ content, sexually explicit materials, and other progressive social issues in schools.
Provides training and campaign resources to candidates who support public education and teachers, the Freedom to Read, LGBTQ+ students, equitable treatment, evidence-based decision-making, student mental-health resources, and collaborative, nonpartisan governance. BoardBOOST explicitly says it does not endorse candidates, although participants are screened for alignment with these values.
Identifies “like-minded” candidates who support inclusive public schools, oppose politically or religiously motivated book bans, support students’ and parents’ freedom to choose library materials, and favor schools free from harassment and discrimination. NJPEC describes these as like-minded candidates rather than formal endorsements.
In 2023, Districts for Democracy identified and supported “like-minded” New Jersey school-board candidates committed to keeping national culture-war politics out of public schools. The organization looked for candidates who supported freedom of inquiry, thought and speech; opposed book bans and censorship; defended diversity and equity; and believed schools should help students think critically and engage with different ideas and perspectives.